Lying by Omission is still lying, By allowing incorrect evidence & information by State of Florida, could have resulted in

A Verdict of Guilty on counts 1,2,& 3… by the jurors of the Casey Anthony trial.

Here is the full CacheBack Press release, including date of FYI to state of Florida.

The fact that the defense knew of this information isn’t really the issue is it? Isn’t it the fact that the state of Florida, Lawson Lamar, Linda Drane Burdick, Jeff Ashton and Frank George… Chose to not only object, that H.Judge Belvin Perry upheld their objection and allowed this incorrect Exhibit and testimony stand, that the information was not stricken from the records, that if was available for items in deliberation and that the jurors had this information. The fact that the defense used the same state’s witness as a witness on Defenses Direct case, offers the inconsistencies existed, why the evidence was allowed to remain is the most blatant example of premeditated-bias.

Advertisement

….. Just One look, Is all it took!

Original Press Release by SiQuest owners of CacheBack data recovery program used by OCSO Computer Investigators. 

 

(orig. Post July 5 2010)

15 days after the verdict was read into the records books by Honorable Judge Belvin Perry Jr, many stories still string up issues regarding the jurors verdict and how justice was not carried out.   I find this article the one that will always offer a valid reason why the death penalty itself  is not the correct answer, when the incorrect answer given by an expert witness, is invalid. 

Cheney Mason, one of Ms. Anthony’s defense lawyers, said it was “outrageous” that prosecutors withheld critical information on the “chloroform” searches.

“The prosecution is absolutely obligated to bring forth to the court any and all evidence that could be exculpatory,” Mr. Mason said. “If in fact this is true, and the prosecution concealed this new information, it is more than shame on them. It is outrageous.”

The correct information is below-

Hits?   Sci-Spot  1        MySpace   84 !

How can this mistake happen, and how can the Judge allow this not to be clarifies in the Closing statements by Jeff Ashton?