A request for Local News WFTV 9, ..”Get back to delivering the news, not BEING the NEWS.”

Jose Baez’s spokesperson said –
WFTV’s Kathi Belich was wrong when she reported this week that Baez “faxed copies of his motion for a change of venue to some reporters before he ever filed it with the court.”
Marti Mackenzie via an email; “Let us know when you plan to retract your report.”
Here is my response –
I posted this on Hal’s blog.
So if WFTV is not making a retraction regarding the assertions that Kathi Belich made during her broadcast, indicating that a copy of the motion filed, had been fax over to media prior to Mr. Baez arriving at the offices of the Orange County Clerk of the Courts House, in which he filed the motion for change of venue.  Have we heard any follow-up or noticed if the “Motion” was posted on the web yet.
It is odd that such a KEY offering from Kathi Belich, would not be followed up with “first here on ch9, the copy of the faxed Motion”, prior to the clerks date/certification.
I realize the ink is already dry on the new three-year contract between Belich and WFTV, but let us get back to reality.  WFTV you are a local ABC news affiliate, not a local reality production house.
Get back to delivering the news, not BEING the NEWS.
jm2cents/Finn

Tony Pipitone asked: Can an impartial jury could be found elsewhere in Florida? what a waste of bandwith…and Kilobytes too.

Tony Pipitone asked, “… can an impartial jury could be found elsewhere in Florida?  What a waste of bandwidth and Kilobytes.
Below is the usual type of blog chatter regarding Casey Anthony case.  This is an example of one person who disagreed with the majority….  His name is John,  the replies he received. 21 responses at last count, this one was short and to the point, but a not a valid rebuttal. John only relief came when my name was brought up in another post I did tonight.
“she has almost single-handedly destroyed any chance of miss Anthony having a fair trial not just in Florida but anywhere in the country. it is nice to know that one woman’s opinion can condemn a person to death or life imprisonment…  I personally feel that miss grace crossed a line and should be fired by fueling a fire just to be on a bandwagon. a woman’s life hangs in the balance. only in America could someone like miss grace get away with what she has caused. Miss Anthony had already been tried and convicted before her first month. thank you for the opportunity to voice my opinion.  Trust me; I don’t mind taking her side and all of the balderdash that comes with it.
Posted by: john gXXXXXXXX | May 06, 2009 at 11:52 AM
He received this reply from another blogger…
Your post just shows what an idiot you are John.
Posted by: XXX | May 06, 2009 at 12:26 PM

Top Tags

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Orlando Sentinel – Click here ~ ……….. ~ a chance to win $100.

 

 

 

 

What’s up with this link. 

I think the Orlando Sentinel has lost sight of it’s own sentinel…

take a look at this link I found this on their web site to day.

I de-activated this link but the link was on this page id    ~6121189.story

 

Click here for Casey Anthony’s photobucket album and a chance to win $100.

Q = “how long does it take to reverse the tide of public opinion” ?

 

 

A = “8 mos.   3 days 15 hrs  32 sec.”

 

 in response to this post on Hal’s Blog –

Casey Anthony: WESH lists four reasons she might be acquitted

Well Hal, I am still not convinced that either stations, WESH or WKMG-Tony Pipitone, are really sincere about their new twist in coverage on this case.

It just goes to show money {adv. dollars}, will dictate what is “news and what is not news worthy”.

Just remember was on this for 8 mos. 3 days 15 hrs & 32 sec. When I posted my first Opinion on my own blog site finnperkins.com </a> I guess some one woke up, and said well I think after the Terence Lenamon Op-Ed in O-Sentinel, I knew I was going to see a tide change, to bad it’s for the wrong reasons.

I guess I should be happy, thankful, and hopeful.<p>–maybe they, WKMG and reporters alike, will have a change of heart one they look at the story the way I have been<p> OBJECTIVELY…Finn

 

 

 

Post Revisions Regarding coverage of the Casey Anthony

 

  • 24 April, 2009 @ 5:17 [Autosave] by Finn Perkins
  • 29 December, 2008 @ 0:32 by Finn Perkins
  • 29 December, 2008 @ 0:32 by Finn Perkins
  • 29 December, 2008 @ 0:25 by Finn Perkins
  • 4 September, 2008 @ 23:01 by Finn Perkins
  • 21 Ausgust,2008 @  08:10 by Finn Perkins

A motion to exempt, please…. Is this where a gag order might be needed?

I know this will not go over well with the majority, but as usual, I am the odd one out on this overall topic.

The fact that Roy Kronk objects to Ms. Anthony’s defense team having full access to his phone records is something that needs to done, the benefit being it will clear Mr. Kronk of any collusion with the defendant,

— Would out weigh my fear of my phone records offered up, in their entirety. —

As far as Mr. Kronk, his Life, being and open book, well he the state of Florida thank for that issue {Gov. in the Sunshine}.

 

FYI – the defense attorney is not the one who releases documents and other trial/attorney work product. The documents release so far on Mr. Kronk and many others, is courtesy of the State of Florida Open records law, but the majority of the information on

 

Mr. Kronk’s, information could have been kept under seal, because his is a material witness in an on going criminal proceeding, therefore the presiding Judge could have rule in favor of the exemption that fits his status in this case.

Judge Strickland over ruled the gag order regarding similar motions filed; and the media, they are the ones feeding information via their wonderful Websites; along with information leaks from the correction facilities officers, who even under the employment guide lines regarding inmate confidentiality [the GoS law does exempt several topics including but not limited to medical unit issues.] The information is still flowing steady out of 33rd street.

I do agree with Mr. Kronk’s attorney, that the motion is to broad. I think the motions was done to compel Mr. Kronk’s attorney to make and offer of what they are willing to release and therefore narrow down a time line. The defense will hold him [witness], to his call records during direct Q & A, and during cross when the State presents their case.

Regarding the FDLE and the OCSO dept. clearing someone, well look at these to names and tell me why their is not more coverage on them.  

There were three Listings found in various FDLE databases, among them was this person

  •  – Zenaida Gonzalez Nazario [case HCSO 04-074360] whom had a complaint file against them in 2004, HCSO report states an allegation of lewd and lascivious act on a child under 16. by a Zenaida Gonzalez Nazario, the other Name that stood out was
  • -Joanny Nazario, she was question by SA Rodriguez, who responded to a sighting of the missing toddler the thrift store. Joanny Nazario stated that she was familiar with the case from the media, when shown a Crime line color photograph of Anthony.

 

Here is where it takes a weird turn. The Thrift store manager Joanny and another woman name Zenaida, share the same last name “Nazario”. The Habitat for Humanity Thrift Store records reflects that, Joanny Nazario’s was on duty and operating the cash register on June 22, the day that a lead came in [AClSS Lead # 168], anonymous caller reported at approximately 1033 a.m. hours when they saw a young female inside that resembled Caylee Anthony. Ms. Joanny Nazario does not recall having seen a young female child resembling Caylee Anthony.

 

The only way Ms. Anthony would know of either person, is if she met them prior to Caylee’s disappearance.  If she had found this Zenaida Name on the internet, the forensic account of her computer would have offer up traces, searches or deleted files. Also not the computer that was in the Anthony home was use by the entire household, not just Ms. Anthony.

 

In order to change their behavior you need to change your own behavior, You think?

 In order to change their behavior, you’ll need to change your own behavior, You think? [forget the “takes a village” theory,    –  just one realistic, empathic parent will do.]

 

Hal’s blog, asked this question “How does Oprah Winfrey handle a serious topic?” stating that watching Oprah (4.21.2009), on the 10th anniversary of the Columbine massacre, would be a preview of how Ms. Winfrey covers a topic that has a lot of unanswered questions.

 

This was my Original comment on Hal’s Blog

The parents of the Columbine murderers and the Casey Anthony’s parents are not one in the same.

The Columbine tragedy, was not only witnessed by the survivors, but the also by the security camera and live footage that was being recorded when the media followed a queue from the CDLE, SWAT, Medical and other first responders to the scene that day. the offenders were also not shy about leaving a trail of first hand discovery by the CDLE searches of their homes.

Regarding the statement that “George and Cindy Anthony are part of the crime”, well unless you have first hand knowledge, and you have come forward and presented this information to FDLE, I would say at best that their culpability is limited to the on going unhealthy relationship with their daughter that transcended even the most opportunistic parent of a child who was unwilling to own up to her inability to maintain a stable environment for her daughter, and the fear she felt, when faced with her parents.

Okay HARD HAT is firmly place upon my noggin, go head… send the spin.

Posted by: finnperkins | April 18, 2009 at 11:13 PM

 

 

The only one you are impressing or amusing here is yourself finn. As stated before by several others, your posts are nonsense and ridiculous. Go find a site for sickos that love babykillers.
JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE!!  Posted by: TLS |
April 19, 2009 at 12:26 PM

 

My Reply to TLS –

 

I accept your opinion, even your expression of dislike through those words, “nonsense” and “ridiculous”. I can even understand that you want justice for the victim. What I don’t understand, that after reading your post several times over, don’t be impressed, I read it repeatedly, because, I do not see the relevance in regards to the topic,

 

– “How does Oprah Winfrey handle a serious topic?” – “shocking revelations and clues the killers left behind. What we can all learn now. “

What I did find in your post, is the inability to express a valid and viable rebuttal to my post, -by offering insulting remarks, only allows a reader, [be it myself or others] to – –

1. Wonder what I had posted, and feel possibly as miffed as I did, with your response.

2. Wonder whether for Caylee, or anyone. What your post has to do with JUSTICE,

3. Wonder why a person with possibly a vast vocabulary would limit themselves to such primitive words.

 

So in closing, again, I appreciate your opinion. Keep writing, looking forward to my next insult…. I‘ll wear my industrial grade Hard Hat.

 

 

p.s. – since my response to this person on Hal’s blog, Ms. Winfrey pulled the segment, and stated in summary, that today was for the families of the victims.

 

IMO – think that we might want to place more media coverage on proactive parenting. Every time a new tragedy hits the news, seems like its daily these days, that asking “how can we stop this from happening again? is a question that will be the hallmark of every story that the media covers, with-out emphasis on how much the old parenting rule – Spare the rod , Spoil the child” , had worked for the “Walton’s, the Ingall’s and 7th Heaven, although these were fictional TV family’s, the stories were autobiographical clips from the writer’s  childhood.

Previous Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: