You know your obsessed with the Anthony case, when your grocery list says, “whole kernel caylee.” instead of “whole kernel corn”

Here is a glimpse-click link for original post.-

“So, on the receipt, I’d labeled the various items, ground beef , velveeta cheese, taco chips, whole kernel corn…but on down the receipt, on the last can of whole kernel corn I had bought, I had written “whole kernel caylee.”

My niece (who found the receipt), really busted my chops over being obsessed with the case when she saw that last night…I tried to defend myself by telling her I rarely ever watch NG anymore…I don’t think she bought it.

 😉   Posted by- “whole kernel caylee.” Kxxx Mxxxxxxx – Batesville, AR

This part was interesting-

You know you’re obsessed, then your grocery list says, “whole kernel caylee.” instead of whole kernel corn”

Here is my response to the same news- I can’t say I am surprised by this move, but this is the era of reality television, and who am I to stand firm on my opinion on due process, and stop the NEW BUSINESS as usual policy when it comes to media’s claim …”. Publics need to know vs. Harm limitation principle,” Besides, I can see a bright side of this Ashleigh Banfield!

I watch her and Jack Ford’s coverage of the Skipper trial here in Florida this past fall.

So with that I will hold comment on how this might harm the case, If the Ms. Kerry, could kindly stop doing the snoopy dance, and know that, the coverage of this civil trial, holds just as much new case law possibilities, as the criminal case.

Finn

Do you know who your neighbors are?

let me introduce you folks to Ms. Zenaida Almodovar, and Mr. Peter Gonzalez Jr.

I am not offering an opinion on this, as this site has been under some form of legal issue before about there postings, but if this documents are un-retouch/edited, they are interesing at best.

This should keep all of you folks busy for a while.  Very intersting, I might even change my mind…Key word is  “might”. this link is worth the look.

 

I am not promoting the opinions of the site, I am just being fair, offering other points of view.

Orlando Sentinel – Click here ~ ……….. ~ a chance to win $100.

 

 

 

 

What’s up with this link. 

I think the Orlando Sentinel has lost sight of it’s own sentinel…

take a look at this link I found this on their web site to day.

I de-activated this link but the link was on this page id    ~6121189.story

 

Click here for Casey Anthony’s photobucket album and a chance to win $100.

Q = “how long does it take to reverse the tide of public opinion” ?

 

 

A = “8 mos.   3 days 15 hrs  32 sec.”

 

 in response to this post on Hal’s Blog –

Casey Anthony: WESH lists four reasons she might be acquitted

Well Hal, I am still not convinced that either stations, WESH or WKMG-Tony Pipitone, are really sincere about their new twist in coverage on this case.

It just goes to show money {adv. dollars}, will dictate what is “news and what is not news worthy”.

Just remember was on this for 8 mos. 3 days 15 hrs & 32 sec. When I posted my first Opinion on my own blog site finnperkins.com </a> I guess some one woke up, and said well I think after the Terence Lenamon Op-Ed in O-Sentinel, I knew I was going to see a tide change, to bad it’s for the wrong reasons.

I guess I should be happy, thankful, and hopeful.<p>–maybe they, WKMG and reporters alike, will have a change of heart one they look at the story the way I have been<p> OBJECTIVELY…Finn

 

 

 

Post Revisions Regarding coverage of the Casey Anthony

 

  • 24 April, 2009 @ 5:17 [Autosave] by Finn Perkins
  • 29 December, 2008 @ 0:32 by Finn Perkins
  • 29 December, 2008 @ 0:32 by Finn Perkins
  • 29 December, 2008 @ 0:25 by Finn Perkins
  • 4 September, 2008 @ 23:01 by Finn Perkins
  • 21 Ausgust,2008 @  08:10 by Finn Perkins

A motion to exempt, please…. Is this where a gag order might be needed?

I know this will not go over well with the majority, but as usual, I am the odd one out on this overall topic.

The fact that Roy Kronk objects to Ms. Anthony’s defense team having full access to his phone records is something that needs to done, the benefit being it will clear Mr. Kronk of any collusion with the defendant,

— Would out weigh my fear of my phone records offered up, in their entirety. —

As far as Mr. Kronk, his Life, being and open book, well he the state of Florida thank for that issue {Gov. in the Sunshine}.

 

FYI – the defense attorney is not the one who releases documents and other trial/attorney work product. The documents release so far on Mr. Kronk and many others, is courtesy of the State of Florida Open records law, but the majority of the information on

 

Mr. Kronk’s, information could have been kept under seal, because his is a material witness in an on going criminal proceeding, therefore the presiding Judge could have rule in favor of the exemption that fits his status in this case.

Judge Strickland over ruled the gag order regarding similar motions filed; and the media, they are the ones feeding information via their wonderful Websites; along with information leaks from the correction facilities officers, who even under the employment guide lines regarding inmate confidentiality [the GoS law does exempt several topics including but not limited to medical unit issues.] The information is still flowing steady out of 33rd street.

I do agree with Mr. Kronk’s attorney, that the motion is to broad. I think the motions was done to compel Mr. Kronk’s attorney to make and offer of what they are willing to release and therefore narrow down a time line. The defense will hold him [witness], to his call records during direct Q & A, and during cross when the State presents their case.

Regarding the FDLE and the OCSO dept. clearing someone, well look at these to names and tell me why their is not more coverage on them.  

There were three Listings found in various FDLE databases, among them was this person

  •  – Zenaida Gonzalez Nazario [case HCSO 04-074360] whom had a complaint file against them in 2004, HCSO report states an allegation of lewd and lascivious act on a child under 16. by a Zenaida Gonzalez Nazario, the other Name that stood out was
  • -Joanny Nazario, she was question by SA Rodriguez, who responded to a sighting of the missing toddler the thrift store. Joanny Nazario stated that she was familiar with the case from the media, when shown a Crime line color photograph of Anthony.

 

Here is where it takes a weird turn. The Thrift store manager Joanny and another woman name Zenaida, share the same last name “Nazario”. The Habitat for Humanity Thrift Store records reflects that, Joanny Nazario’s was on duty and operating the cash register on June 22, the day that a lead came in [AClSS Lead # 168], anonymous caller reported at approximately 1033 a.m. hours when they saw a young female inside that resembled Caylee Anthony. Ms. Joanny Nazario does not recall having seen a young female child resembling Caylee Anthony.

 

The only way Ms. Anthony would know of either person, is if she met them prior to Caylee’s disappearance.  If she had found this Zenaida Name on the internet, the forensic account of her computer would have offer up traces, searches or deleted files. Also not the computer that was in the Anthony home was use by the entire household, not just Ms. Anthony.

 

In order to change their behavior you need to change your own behavior, You think?

 In order to change their behavior, you’ll need to change your own behavior, You think? [forget the “takes a village” theory,    –  just one realistic, empathic parent will do.]

 

Hal’s blog, asked this question “How does Oprah Winfrey handle a serious topic?” stating that watching Oprah (4.21.2009), on the 10th anniversary of the Columbine massacre, would be a preview of how Ms. Winfrey covers a topic that has a lot of unanswered questions.

 

This was my Original comment on Hal’s Blog

The parents of the Columbine murderers and the Casey Anthony’s parents are not one in the same.

The Columbine tragedy, was not only witnessed by the survivors, but the also by the security camera and live footage that was being recorded when the media followed a queue from the CDLE, SWAT, Medical and other first responders to the scene that day. the offenders were also not shy about leaving a trail of first hand discovery by the CDLE searches of their homes.

Regarding the statement that “George and Cindy Anthony are part of the crime”, well unless you have first hand knowledge, and you have come forward and presented this information to FDLE, I would say at best that their culpability is limited to the on going unhealthy relationship with their daughter that transcended even the most opportunistic parent of a child who was unwilling to own up to her inability to maintain a stable environment for her daughter, and the fear she felt, when faced with her parents.

Okay HARD HAT is firmly place upon my noggin, go head… send the spin.

Posted by: finnperkins | April 18, 2009 at 11:13 PM

 

 

The only one you are impressing or amusing here is yourself finn. As stated before by several others, your posts are nonsense and ridiculous. Go find a site for sickos that love babykillers.
JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE!!  Posted by: TLS |
April 19, 2009 at 12:26 PM

 

My Reply to TLS –

 

I accept your opinion, even your expression of dislike through those words, “nonsense” and “ridiculous”. I can even understand that you want justice for the victim. What I don’t understand, that after reading your post several times over, don’t be impressed, I read it repeatedly, because, I do not see the relevance in regards to the topic,

 

– “How does Oprah Winfrey handle a serious topic?” – “shocking revelations and clues the killers left behind. What we can all learn now. “

What I did find in your post, is the inability to express a valid and viable rebuttal to my post, -by offering insulting remarks, only allows a reader, [be it myself or others] to – –

1. Wonder what I had posted, and feel possibly as miffed as I did, with your response.

2. Wonder whether for Caylee, or anyone. What your post has to do with JUSTICE,

3. Wonder why a person with possibly a vast vocabulary would limit themselves to such primitive words.

 

So in closing, again, I appreciate your opinion. Keep writing, looking forward to my next insult…. I‘ll wear my industrial grade Hard Hat.

 

 

p.s. – since my response to this person on Hal’s blog, Ms. Winfrey pulled the segment, and stated in summary, that today was for the families of the victims.

 

IMO – think that we might want to place more media coverage on proactive parenting. Every time a new tragedy hits the news, seems like its daily these days, that asking “how can we stop this from happening again? is a question that will be the hallmark of every story that the media covers, with-out emphasis on how much the old parenting rule – Spare the rod , Spoil the child” , had worked for the “Walton’s, the Ingall’s and 7th Heaven, although these were fictional TV family’s, the stories were autobiographical clips from the writer’s  childhood.

Guess What, Did you know when the state seeks the death penalty, the Defendant becomes eligible for state money.”

Watch what you wish for, when you don’t want to pick up the tab.
A man was convicted and sentenced to die for the 1978 rape and murder of a 6-year-old child in Chatham County, Georgia, the kind of high-visibility crime that exerts great pressure on police and prosecutors to solve quickly.

On November 6, 1991, after more than eleven years protesting his innocence–watching time forever slip away behind him while it moved him closer and closer to the electric chairThe Man was released. A free man.

It had taken his appellate lawyers, working without pay, that many years to prove that the government’s capital case against their client rested on a foundation of official lies, the knowing use of false testimony, and the willful suppression of evidence in the state’s possession which not only tended to support appellee’s claim of innocence, but which pointed to the guilt of another.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

“Is that the best rebuttal you have?, that I misspelled a word!” responding to Txx

“oh and by the way genius, it’s cynicism, not Sinicism….lmao”.   

Above was Posted by: Txx on Hal's Blog 

Is that the best rebuttal you have, a misspelled a word.  I was in the middle of a seeking all sides and the length marked components of a triangle, trigonometric function called.” modeling periodic phenomena.”  The results were printing, mean while, I was reading the Hal’s Blog, when oops, a slip of the middle finger hit the “S” key in stead of the “C” key, the rest, it’s infamous thanks to you pointing it out my in ability to type 318 words, one of which was misspelled.  I guess I will stick to modeling periodic phenomena for now [note to self, turn off computer before doing research charts].

A not so normal sentence on a normal day – “So you got Jury Duty”! you might want to look up these words and phrases – , “peremptory challenge, ” “death-qualified” , “Fair and Balanced”.

“- the blogger in the jury room please stand up”!

The other thing that the blog could produce is evidence that the juror has prejudged the case. It could also provide evidence that in some cases perhaps the jurors lied or fudged the truth during voir dire. All of those could cause motions for new trial,” Conrad said.

A New York trial judge, state Supreme Court Justice Helen Freedman, said jurors should not blog until the trial is over.

“You’re not supposed to talk to anyone about the case, so by posting or blogging you’re talking to people about the case,” she said.

Right to Impartial Jurors
Your client has a constitutional right, in both civil and criminal cases, to have his or her case heard and decided by an “impartial” jury. See Florida Constitution, Declaration of Rights, Article 1, Section 22 and Section 16.

This fundamental right to an impartial jury is the same in both civil and criminal cases. State v. Neil, 457 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1984);

i.e; –
City of Miami v. Cornett, 463 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 3DCA 1985). The trial lawyer must be aware of Florida Statute 913.12 which states: “The qualifications of jurors in criminal cases shall be the same as their qualifications in civil cases.” The “burden of proof” may be different between civil and criminal cases, but the qualifications of jurors are not! The qualifications of the jurors are the same regardless of whether the case is a murder trial or a slip-and-fall trial.

This statute is important because it broadens the case law available to the trial lawyer. The appellate cases, be they civil or criminal, apply equally in all proceedings. Criminal case law applies just as much in a civil trial as it does in a criminal trial when the issue is the qualifications of the jurors, and vice versa. See e.g. Pacot v. Wheeler, 758 So2d 1141 (Fla 4 DCA 2000) “We note that this strict standard, which is equally applicable in civil and criminal cases, does not appear to leave room for “broad” discretion in these circumstances.”

1. Mandatory Disqualification:

      Biased Jurors –

  • Any person who “has a state of mind regarding the defendant, the case, or the person alleged to have been injured … that will prevent the juror from acting with impartiality.” (913.03); Any person who “has formed or expressed any opinion or is sensible of any bias or prejudice concerning it.” (1.431);
  • Any person “interested in any issue to be tried” in the action (40.013 & 1.431); Any person who is an employee or who has been an employee of any party within 30 days before trial (1.431);
  • Any person under prosecution for any crime (40.013);
  • Convicted felons or those convicted of bribery, forgery, perjury or larceny (unless rights restored) (40.013);
  • Governor and his cabinet (40.013); Clerk of Court; Full time Law enforcement officers and investigators (unless they choose to serve)(40.013);
  • Persons related by blood or marriage within the third degree to the plaintiff, defendant or the attorneys (913.03 & 1.431);
  • Any person who does not possess sufficient knowledge of reading, writing or arithmetic to understand the case, if the case requires such knowledge (1.431)

Goodspeed. . . .

 

[citation – Vesna Jaksic
The National Law Journal
March 19, 2007 ]

I know what I do not want from my local News station,… warning sweeps weeks in may coming soon to WFTV, WESH, WKMG and CFNews 13

 why do they have an email for suggestions, when they do not read them,
if they did, there would be some changes.  The new tag line for all these
stations should be “[wkmg, wesh, wftv, not necessarily the news, ..news”

“What do you want from local News” ?

It seem the the stations, are always adding a local angle on the national subjects,
always making something closer to sensationalism verse truth. “so what the guy
who rescued so and so, is the third cousin of a guy who lives in Orlando”….

Too much news time? Yes, 3 hours of the same stories is just enough to place
anyone under doctors care, Diagnosis – Post Traumatic Stress syndrome, due
to fear mongering Local New stations. A corollary to this complaint was a sense
from many of the respondents that there’s too much repetition in newscasts.
Of course, there is an easy way for viewers to solve the repetition problem themselves:
Just turn off the TV. Too many teases? too much hype: “We watch the news
to be informed and not to be asked questions about a story that is coming up,”
“Please quit telling me over and over what you are going to tell me at 6 o’clock,”
 “Just tell me.” The word “hype” was used repeatedly by viewers frustrated
by hyperbole in newscasts.

Too Much Similarly?  when that’s not where it happened other than to hype
the story unnecessarily? Misleading Headlines and teasers, not until
the actual segment is air do you find out that it was no where near
the area the headlines stated.

Too much weather:?
WFTV 9 has “Severe Weather Center 9” [banner is in studio all year round]
WESH 2 has “Weather Plus+ [channel 2 recently change theirs, from Super Doppler 2 ]
WKMG 6 has “Storm Chasers” ,
and CFNews13 “weather on the ones”.
I can see the ” 1″  in my after an hour of watching that station.

Although I’m sure local stations have reams of research and ratings spikes that prove
viewers love weather news, but most viewers were annoyed by weather hype.  
I guess it is never sunny in Florida anymore..tourism down, we have our local
weather stations to thank for that.

Too many references to Web sites?  “The phrase that sends me not to my computer, 
but through the roof, especially when it it lightening and thundering, and I’m going
to turn on my computer…duh. – ‘If you want to know more about this subject log
on to our Web site …”

 This is not just an issue with local stations, but I address this because people
who have been left with the digital TV changes and have no choice but their local stations,
I think it is the local stations responsibilityto offer a non-bias representation of the news
and the people it is covering as well as the people who newer base.

footnote – FAIR  – The first step in challenging biased news coverage is documenting bias.

 

added reading – Profiting from the panic

Previous Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: