A motion to exempt, please…. Is this where a gag order might be needed?

I know this will not go over well with the majority, but as usual, I am the odd one out on this overall topic.

The fact that Roy Kronk objects to Ms. Anthony’s defense team having full access to his phone records is something that needs to done, the benefit being it will clear Mr. Kronk of any collusion with the defendant,

— Would out weigh my fear of my phone records offered up, in their entirety. —

As far as Mr. Kronk, his Life, being and open book, well he the state of Florida thank for that issue {Gov. in the Sunshine}.

 

FYI – the defense attorney is not the one who releases documents and other trial/attorney work product. The documents release so far on Mr. Kronk and many others, is courtesy of the State of Florida Open records law, but the majority of the information on

 

Mr. Kronk’s, information could have been kept under seal, because his is a material witness in an on going criminal proceeding, therefore the presiding Judge could have rule in favor of the exemption that fits his status in this case.

Judge Strickland over ruled the gag order regarding similar motions filed; and the media, they are the ones feeding information via their wonderful Websites; along with information leaks from the correction facilities officers, who even under the employment guide lines regarding inmate confidentiality [the GoS law does exempt several topics including but not limited to medical unit issues.] The information is still flowing steady out of 33rd street.

I do agree with Mr. Kronk’s attorney, that the motion is to broad. I think the motions was done to compel Mr. Kronk’s attorney to make and offer of what they are willing to release and therefore narrow down a time line. The defense will hold him [witness], to his call records during direct Q & A, and during cross when the State presents their case.

Regarding the FDLE and the OCSO dept. clearing someone, well look at these to names and tell me why their is not more coverage on them.  

There were three Listings found in various FDLE databases, among them was this person

  •  – Zenaida Gonzalez Nazario [case HCSO 04-074360] whom had a complaint file against them in 2004, HCSO report states an allegation of lewd and lascivious act on a child under 16. by a Zenaida Gonzalez Nazario, the other Name that stood out was
  • -Joanny Nazario, she was question by SA Rodriguez, who responded to a sighting of the missing toddler the thrift store. Joanny Nazario stated that she was familiar with the case from the media, when shown a Crime line color photograph of Anthony.

 

Here is where it takes a weird turn. The Thrift store manager Joanny and another woman name Zenaida, share the same last name “Nazario”. The Habitat for Humanity Thrift Store records reflects that, Joanny Nazario’s was on duty and operating the cash register on June 22, the day that a lead came in [AClSS Lead # 168], anonymous caller reported at approximately 1033 a.m. hours when they saw a young female inside that resembled Caylee Anthony. Ms. Joanny Nazario does not recall having seen a young female child resembling Caylee Anthony.

 

The only way Ms. Anthony would know of either person, is if she met them prior to Caylee’s disappearance.  If she had found this Zenaida Name on the internet, the forensic account of her computer would have offer up traces, searches or deleted files. Also not the computer that was in the Anthony home was use by the entire household, not just Ms. Anthony.

 

In order to change their behavior you need to change your own behavior, You think?

 In order to change their behavior, you’ll need to change your own behavior, You think? [forget the “takes a village” theory,    –  just one realistic, empathic parent will do.]

 

Hal’s blog, asked this question “How does Oprah Winfrey handle a serious topic?” stating that watching Oprah (4.21.2009), on the 10th anniversary of the Columbine massacre, would be a preview of how Ms. Winfrey covers a topic that has a lot of unanswered questions.

 

This was my Original comment on Hal’s Blog

The parents of the Columbine murderers and the Casey Anthony’s parents are not one in the same.

The Columbine tragedy, was not only witnessed by the survivors, but the also by the security camera and live footage that was being recorded when the media followed a queue from the CDLE, SWAT, Medical and other first responders to the scene that day. the offenders were also not shy about leaving a trail of first hand discovery by the CDLE searches of their homes.

Regarding the statement that “George and Cindy Anthony are part of the crime”, well unless you have first hand knowledge, and you have come forward and presented this information to FDLE, I would say at best that their culpability is limited to the on going unhealthy relationship with their daughter that transcended even the most opportunistic parent of a child who was unwilling to own up to her inability to maintain a stable environment for her daughter, and the fear she felt, when faced with her parents.

Okay HARD HAT is firmly place upon my noggin, go head… send the spin.

Posted by: finnperkins | April 18, 2009 at 11:13 PM

 

 

The only one you are impressing or amusing here is yourself finn. As stated before by several others, your posts are nonsense and ridiculous. Go find a site for sickos that love babykillers.
JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE!!  Posted by: TLS |
April 19, 2009 at 12:26 PM

 

My Reply to TLS –

 

I accept your opinion, even your expression of dislike through those words, “nonsense” and “ridiculous”. I can even understand that you want justice for the victim. What I don’t understand, that after reading your post several times over, don’t be impressed, I read it repeatedly, because, I do not see the relevance in regards to the topic,

 

– “How does Oprah Winfrey handle a serious topic?” – “shocking revelations and clues the killers left behind. What we can all learn now. “

What I did find in your post, is the inability to express a valid and viable rebuttal to my post, -by offering insulting remarks, only allows a reader, [be it myself or others] to – –

1. Wonder what I had posted, and feel possibly as miffed as I did, with your response.

2. Wonder whether for Caylee, or anyone. What your post has to do with JUSTICE,

3. Wonder why a person with possibly a vast vocabulary would limit themselves to such primitive words.

 

So in closing, again, I appreciate your opinion. Keep writing, looking forward to my next insult…. I‘ll wear my industrial grade Hard Hat.

 

 

p.s. – since my response to this person on Hal’s blog, Ms. Winfrey pulled the segment, and stated in summary, that today was for the families of the victims.

 

IMO – think that we might want to place more media coverage on proactive parenting. Every time a new tragedy hits the news, seems like its daily these days, that asking “how can we stop this from happening again? is a question that will be the hallmark of every story that the media covers, with-out emphasis on how much the old parenting rule – Spare the rod , Spoil the child” , had worked for the “Walton’s, the Ingall’s and 7th Heaven, although these were fictional TV family’s, the stories were autobiographical clips from the writer’s  childhood.

%d bloggers like this: