Some prefer to use insults toward Casey’s attorneys to affirm their opinion, “that Casey is guilty”…I think otherwise.

Some prefer to use insults toward Casey’s attorneys to affirm their opinion, “that Casey is guilty”…I think otherwise.

Orlando Sentinel TV Guy’s Hal Boedeker’s blog noted that the trial might be head out of the area; below is an example of comments.

 

Someone listed the top ten reasons why Jose wanted the trial moved to Miami.

TOP TEN REASONS BOZO Baez wants trial moved to MIAMI …Here was the number one reason, Too funny-#1 BOZO thinks Kathi Belich doesn’t KNOW “WHERE” Miami is.

Posted by: Karen Lee - “This is amusing but is it really a valid to hate the attorney.  I thought it show ignorance on the part of the writer.”

 

I had stated this on Orlando Sentinel’s TV Guy, Hal Boedeker’s blog, after another person used insults to infer that my opinion was baseless and that I was an idiot…

           I still find it funny that most of people who want to convince me that Casey is guilty, prefer to use insults toward her attorneys to affirm their opinion that Casey is guilty. I have yet to read an original opinion, not based on mainstream media topics, to offer anything of your own thought [copy & pasting info doesn't count] to sway me believe otherwise”

The same person replied again, but this time, the blogger must have gotten my point, as they sent me this:
Distain replies: (no mention of Baez) Decomp found in Casey’s trunk (not someone else’s trunk), hair follicle with death band on found in the same trunk, hair identified through DNA as definitively belonging to a member of the Anthony family, Caylee is the only Anthony found dead.
How does hair with death band from dead child end up in trunk of Casey’s car if dead child was never in trunk post mortem? Smell of death confirmed by FBI via air sample testing & LE experience to be distinctly that of a decomposing dead body. Anthony’s claim odor to be that of rotting pizza – FBI found no pizza or meat biproducts in trash or trunk only an empty pizza box. Cadaver dogs hit on trunk, but have never hit on rotting pizza. Air tests from Casey’s car show human decomposition.
Casey acting alone abandoned her car in parking lot at the Amscot. Tony Lazzaro picked up Casey because she claimed to have run out of gas which was later driven away with close to ½ tank of gas by George Anthony. There were no mechanical defects LE found with the car yet Casey abandon the car with gas and fully operational.
  • Why did she leave the car if it was drivable especially when she was supposedly “searching” for her daughter and the nanny.
  • Why did she need Tony to pick her up? She could have easily driven herself to Tony’s. Casey never went back for her car and never reported the car missing, lied to friends about where it was any never reported mechanical issues to anyone.
  • Why would a mother of a missing child not seek a mechanic to have her car fixed if she needed the car to search?
 High levels of chloroform found in Casey’s trunk. Has the same high levels of chloroform ever been found in anyone else’s trunk where there was never a dead body? Internet searches on Anthony computer during work days when Casey could be using the computer. Searches related to killing someone with chloroform, neck breaking, homemade weapons and shovel just a few months before Caylee winds up missing and dead by homicide. Does anyone else have these kind of searches on their computer who isn’t writing a school paper or doing work research and has a child wind up dead shortly after? There was also a search of the nanny bduction issue of the show One Tree Hill on the Anthony computer shortly before Caylee’s disappearance and the actress who played the nanny mirrors the description Casey provided LE of Zenaida.
Casey never told anyone that Caylee was missing and suspected she’d be kidnapped. She did not even mention anything odd or out of sorts in her diary. Why would a parent conceal the kidnapping of their only child and go on daily afterward business as usual? Where are the frantic calls on her phone, pleading texts to Zanny or any calls for that matter to the Nanny after Caylee went missing? Casey’s phone records prove she had plenty of time to text and call everyone else except the women she believed stole her child, why?
Does anyone else in US history have a dead child who has been stolen by a living, breathing human they can’t identify or find, that no form of technology has been able to locate, that no human being other than the mother has ever seen or met, can’t be proven ever existed?
How reasonable is it that a person, who historically sends 12,000 text messages a month has no phone record of EVER sending a single text message or making one phone call to the nanny that supposedly regularly care for her child? What are the odds that a mother with a dead child and no job has use for a nanny? When was the child with this so called “nanny”? Was Caylee ever unaccounted for during the times she was supposed to be with the nanny? If Caylee was being watched by this nanny then she wasn’t with anyone else. Can anyone show these unaccounted for times? How many cases have been reported in the US of a mother not contacting police or telling another living human being to include siblings, family, best friends or your diary that your child has been kidnapped and missing for over a month?
 How many people in the history of time have spent their time after their only child went missing going to bars and lingerie parties, peeing in parking lots, posting drunken photos of themselves on the internet, kissing women, sleeping with various men, stealing checks and credit cards from family and friends, buying food and alcohol for their boyfriend, but never making a single purchase for their missing child? What are the odds of this type of irrational behavior from a mother when complete strangers make memorials for children they never met? Casey originally claimed she last saw Caylee on June 9th, so how was Caylee photographed on her great grandfather’s lap on July 14th, Father’s Day?
  • How many people hyperventilate once they hear the body of child was found in a location only later confirmed was actually her daughter and completely dismiss when other reporting’s of possible remains are found in other parts of the county?
  • How many people get released from jail twice and don’t spend a moment of their time looking for their missing child, but have grave concerns about what their boyfriend is doing and thinking?
  • How many children are killed by a babysitter in a different location with items found from the mother’s home when that person has never been to that home?
  • How does a sticker on duct tape covering the child’s mouth have the backing from the same sticker still located inside the home of the mother?
 If anyone else killed this child wouldn’t the backing be in the trash or where the killer had last been? What are the odds it would be in the home of a completely innocent person?
Posted by: Distain for CMA | May 07, 2009 at 11:40 AM

 

I think I might agree, now that there is clarity in the rhetoric.  It also allows the reader understand how they arrived at their opinion.

About these ads

21 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Molly
    May 07, 2009 @ 23:59:49

    Great post distain. But what is your point finn? You can believe anything you want to. I don’t know one person that uses Casey’s attorneys to show their thoughts on why they think she’s guilty. Any insults towards Baez are because of the way he acts, things he says & how he is handling things.

  2. Suzie Jane
    May 08, 2009 @ 00:23:47

    Go away Finn – please and thank you

  3. lynn
    May 08, 2009 @ 01:25:30

    HEY FINN…..When did you get out?

  4. Clarissa
    May 08, 2009 @ 06:17:12

    Finn you say id you disagree with someone you’re an idiot. I disagree. Your only an idiot if you actually believe Casey is innocent after all the evidence that was clearly NOT cut and pasted that disdain just
    typed out for you. I have no opinion on Baez, he’s just another lawyer his behavior never swayed my opinion of Casey, her actions did. Just because people at this post don’t agree with your opinion does not make them idiots. Statements like your last one Finn seem more moronic than alot of the comments I’ve read so far on this site.

    • Finn Perkins
      May 08, 2009 @ 06:21:40

      thanks for your opinion. I never said that “Finn you say id you disagree with someone you’re an idiot. “. it was the other reader who wrote that to me. re-read it and comment please.

    • Finn Perkins
      May 08, 2009 @ 13:49:33

      D for cma stated that I was an idiot because I disagree with them. if you go to original post at the link I offered you will see it.

  5. Molly
    May 08, 2009 @ 13:48:02

    Since you “cut & pasted” everything else distain said, you should have included the post where they call you an idiot, but I think their last post listed above explains their meaning.
    I really don’t understand why copy & pasting from documents, interviews & evidence in this case “doesn’t count” as that information is pertinent in formulating an opinion & is what will be presented in court. Distain did an excellent job of interpretting it for you.

    • Finn Perkins
      May 08, 2009 @ 13:51:30

      Molly,

      when I referenced the cut & pasted, it was about the fact that many blog copy and paste from the local media outlet here in orlando. and ap wire sites. I would like to read original words. D for CMA is the closet thing I I have read to an original though regarding the c Anthony case. I agree with her on her account, I disagree with the media’s coverage and the internet bloggers who think their word is fact.

  6. Clarissa
    May 08, 2009 @ 15:23:44

    MY MISTAKE… Alright so I posted way before my coffee this morning Finn and your right D said that. So my question to you is this…Why are you so bent on having someone prove to you that CMA is guilty? Doesn’t all of the evidence so far, circumstantial or not, stand on its own as evidence of guilt? If Baez had one iota of evidence proving otherwise, don’t you think Casey would have had him show it to prove her innocence and get her out of jail?She was a technological junkie, she had to go through texting and facebook withdrawal incarcerated, a speedy trial is what she would be pushing for if they had any leg to stand on. What do you think?

    • Finn Perkins
      May 08, 2009 @ 15:43:57

      just your statement alone shows me that your opinion is emotionally driven, maybe with a hint of facts, but otherwise..just another assertion into something NONE of us know anything about.

  7. Clarissa
    May 08, 2009 @ 20:07:08

    WTF!!!! You are twisted! Emotionally driven my ass! THIS is emotionally driven! Your ego-driven pompous attitude in the way you phrase you comments is infuriating,when I’m just asking YOUR OPINION. Why you come onto this site like some know it all spewing your challenges to the readers on this blog to TRY and prove her guilt, I.E. “Convince you of her guilt.” It’s beyond me. If your that blind to it, stop posting here. Then you criticize the people who want to discuss this case. If your are that detached to the rest of society to not see that Caylee has touched many people, then maybe you should find a site that supports Casey. You obviously identify with her. Please enlighten me Finn, what opinion is SO emotionally driven that you were forced not to answer except to sh*t out more of your stupid, pompous comments. Actually please don’t answer, I’m done with you because you know I’m right–that’s why you didn’t answer. The only part that You are right on is that we don’t know anything about this case except what has been out in discovery, and the overwhelming majority of it points to CMA’s guilt.

    • Finn Perkins
      May 08, 2009 @ 20:15:04

      statements like this is why I used the word “emotional”. I take it you are not Hal Boedeker, and that you are not speaking for the orlando sentinel.

      the blog is a place to share opinions, whether we agree with you or the majority, is not your call to tel me to take a hike. Remember, you just made a selfless rant on my blog…and look, I approved your coment with out edit, and I have replied to you with out insult.

      best regards, [fill in blank ] – Clarissa, andreabre72…or what ever id you choose to place in the blank.

      • Clarissa
        May 08, 2009 @ 22:26:46

        As I pointed out my last post was based on emotion. You still never answered my question-why you feel the need for everyone to prove CMA’s innocence to you. No I am not Hal nor do I speak for Orlando as I am pure east coast. And yes this is a place to share opinions, not shoot them down with self-important rants. And yes, I did make a SELFLESS rant of my own, thank you for not editing or insulting, it is appreciated. I don’t know if you mean to come off crass, but you do. I honestly wanted to know what you thought when I posted my first response. Name is Clarissa, and I use my partners acct. thank you:)

        • Finn Perkins
          May 08, 2009 @ 22:49:40

          I am not trying to prove innocence or guilt. I am trying to offer up information that the US constitution is the backbone of our communication infrastructure. It is also the constant factor in our Judaical system. If the media choose to continue to offer links and photos and videos of this case, they will be a large factor in the appeals process should the verdict not be in favor of the defendant.

          I have noticed several times the files that show motions from the state, are not date stamped by the clerks office. Any motions that are to be filed with the court regarding any case, must be filed before release. If the documents are released prior to filing with the court, whomever is offering this information, has ignored proper Florida criminal procedure.

          the most recent one is the on that was listing John Ashton as the author of the motion, and yet it is not signed, nor is it date stamped by the clerk of the courts.

          I don’t give a hoot if she is or isn’t guilty, I am defending the right to due process, and the right to privacy, including medical records.

  8. Molly
    May 08, 2009 @ 20:33:43

    I don’t know which blogging sites you have visited, but there are many that store ALL of the documents/evidence released, the interviews of witnesses being called at trial, timelines, etc. for the convenience of the bloggers posting on these sites. Many of the bloggers themselves save these documents & reference them during conversations to back up their point or opinion. Most of the bloggers have read every single piece of paper released & watched the interviews, etc. & this is what they have formed their opinion on. Yes, copies of the latest news articles are sometimes posted & discussed, but they surely are not what drives their decisions of the facts in this case.

    • Finn Perkins
      May 08, 2009 @ 20:49:48

      two words.

      electronic plagiarism

      If you want original stuff on this case, yes she uses some of the documents and photos released but it ids original text. truely and op-ed format.
      motherclucker.wordpress.com

  9. Molly
    May 08, 2009 @ 21:12:46

    The posts on here are very hard to read as they are
    blocked by the link band on the right side.
    wordpress has other informative sites also,
    including motherclucker
    humbleopinion
    itsamysterytome
    neicey
    They all have the documents/evidence released, interviews,
    videos, opinions & interpretations, if you’re looking
    for information.

  10. MaryA
    May 08, 2009 @ 23:31:50

    Finn wrote: “I have noticed several times the files that show motions from the state, are not date stamped by the clerks office. Any motions that are to be filed with the court regarding any case, must be filed before release. If the documents are released prior to filing with the court, whomever is offering this information, has ignored proper Florida criminal procedure.”
    ************************

    So you really think someone with the State Attorney’s office or on the prosecution team is just blithely ignoring the law and you (oh enlightened one) are on to them? I doubt it very seriously. They know what to do and how to do it. I think this is a very competent prosecution team. The defense too will be on their toes….it’s shaping up to be a battle royal and with this much at stake I think Casey will get a fair trial. Don’t worry about it.

    • Finn Perkins
      May 08, 2009 @ 23:43:28

      Okay, I won’t worried my little asian head of such.

      Sheriff Demmings, stated that he was following up on the leaks see article-

      ORLANDO — Orange County sheriff Jerry Demings is telling his personnel
      to stop leaking information
      on the Casey Anthony case to the media. Demings told the Orlando Sentinel, “We’re not going to lose cases because of loose lips.”

      a leak is referencing “active criminal information” this is exempt from the open records law.
      look it up here.

      here’s snippit-
      119.071 General exemptions from inspection or copying of public records.–

      ……… was prepared in anticipation of imminent civil or criminal litigation or imminent adversarial administrative proceedings, is exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution until the conclusion of the litigation or adversarial administrative proceedings.

      I agree with battle, and the Burdick is a gr8t ASA, I just have a different opinion on how to get to the other side

    • Teri
      May 19, 2009 @ 23:50:28

      I agree with you Mary.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40 other followers

%d bloggers like this: